The term “fly-by-wire” refers to the flight control systems that use computers to process the flight control inputs made by the pilot or autopilot, and send corresponding electrical signals to the control surfaces of the aircraft.
Wire” is used to describe systems that do not use a computer, but instead rely on a combination of sensors and actuators to control the aerodynamic forces acting on the wings and fuselage.
These systems can be used for both fixed wing and rotary wing aircraft such as the Boeing 707, 727 and 767, as well as for multi-engined aircraft like the Lockheed C-130 Hercules and the Northrop Grumman B-52 Stratofortress.
Table of Contents
Why is it called fly-by-wire?
The fly-by-wire means that in the aircraft, the (pilot or autopilot) control inputs are fed to the (flight) computer, which processes them and determines the required control surface movements. The first is the rudder, and the second is aileron and elevator. Both of these are controlled by the flight control computer (FCC), which is mounted on the fuselage.
It is also possible to use a joystick to control these surfaces, but this is not recommended because it can be difficult to keep the joystick in a position that is comfortable for the pilot. In addition, it is very difficult for a pilot to maintain a stable attitude in an aircraft that has a large number of moving parts, such as a fighter jet. Ailerons and elevators are also very sensitive to changes in airspeed and direction.
Is fly-by-wire safe?
Although fly-by-wire has demonstrated its safety and reliability, things can go wrong. Preflight built-in tests are the beginning of the system’s integrity. Control law protections kick in and the system can be shut down if signal processing errors or computer or control malfunction occur. Fly-By-Wire has been in use in the U.S. for more than a decade, but it’s only recently that the FAA has begun to take notice.
In 2012, the agency issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) seeking public comment on whether the technology should be allowed to continue to be used in commercial airliners. A year later, it issued its final NPRM, which was published in December 2014. That final rule, however, did not address the issue of whether or not to allow the use of fly by wire systems in passenger aircraft.
Instead, its focus was on the safety of the systems and their ability to operate safely in a wide range of conditions, including extreme temperatures, high winds, turbulence and other conditions that are not typically encountered in air travel, such as high-altitude cloud cover and low visibility.
Is the 737 Max fly-by-wire?
MAX has a new fly-by-wire spoiler system. This will help improve production flow, reduce weight and improve stopping distances. The ground spoiler control valve has been replaced by a Ground Spoiler Valve (GVSV), while the spoiler mixer unit has been replaced by a Spoiler Control Electronics ( ) unit.
The front and rear bumpers have been redesigned. They are now made of carbon fiber and are lighter than the previous models. All of these changes were made in order to make the car more aerodynamic and reduce drag.
Does the 737 use fly-by-wire?
This means that if one pilot wants to fly the plane, the other pilot can do the same. 777X is the first plane in the world to have a fly-by-wire system, and it’s a big deal for the company.
The new plane will be able to take off and land without the need for a pilot. It will also have an autopilot system that will allow it to land on its own, without having to be commanded to do so.
What is the opposite of fly-by-wire?
Conventional manual controls take input from the pilot via a yoke and use cables and pulleys to control the flight control actuator. This is a simpler system than fly by wire, but is heavier and lacks the precision of a computer-controlled system.
The new system, developed by researchers at the University of California, San Diego (UCSD) and the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) in Colorado Springs, Colorado, is based on a new type of hydraulic control system that is lighter, more compact, and more precise than conventional hydraulics.
“This is the first time that we’ve been able to use a hydraulic system in an aircraft that’s not a helicopter or a fixed wing airplane,” said lead author and UCSD professor of aeronautics and astronautics, Dr. Michael J. O’Donnell, in a press release.
Is an Airbus safer than Boeing?
Airbus has suffered 86 total crashes or accidents between its models – fewer than just the 147 suffered by Boeing’s 737 alone. The relative safety of the two models should be assessed on the basis of the comparative length of service and number of Boeings in use.